Skip Navigation



Journal of the History of Collections Advance Access published online on January 27, 2006
Journal of the History of Collections, doi:10.1093/jhc/fhi042
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/1/9    most recent
fhi042v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Owen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved

Article

Collecting artefacts, acquiring empire

Janet Owen *

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Janet Owen, E-mail: jowen{at}nmm.ac.uk


  Abstract

This paper uses collections and collecting activity to explore the relationship between Enlightenment thinking and practice in the early-nineteenth century and the Darwinist sciences that underpinned late-nineteenth-century British imperialism. It takes a long-term view on the changing cultural meaning of three Inupiat artefacts and the motivations behind the actions of the two nineteenth-century British individuals who collected and owned them. Sir Edward Belcher collected them from their original communities in the 1820s as part of the Enlightenment mission of scientific discovery championed by Sir Joseph Banks and John Barrow. He donated three items to Sir John Lubbock in 1867 who also purchased a further selection in 1872 when Belcher sold his collection at public auction. Lubbock incorporated these items into a larger personal reference collection and utilized them within the context of this wider collection to provide authentic ‘proof’ for his Darwinist theories about prehistoric archaeology, ethnography and cultural evolution that were used to justify imperial activity in late-nineteenth-century Britain.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.